Divorce Stinks. Here’s How to Make It Easier.
Navigating divorce is never easy, but collaborative law can help save you time and money. We sat down with Lisa Gill of Gill Family Law to learn more about this approach and how it can minimize conflict. Image: iStock

Collaborative Divorce vs. Traditional Litigation
The biggest (and perhaps most important) difference between collaborative divorce and traditional litigation is that both parties agree not to seek assistance from a judge or the court system. Instead, they enter into a participation agreement. This agreement outlines both parties’ commitment to resolving their issues outside of court and jointly engaging neutral professionals rather than each party retaining their own. “In a collaborative situation, both parties agree on what type of expert is needed to reach a resolution,” explains Lisa. “You’re only hiring one person and agreeing to adhere to their professional opinion. This is just one way that collaborative law is different and more cost-effective — parties agree on who gets hired, and there’s only one expert instead of one on each side.”
The Benefits of Collaborative Law
Beyond the obvious benefit of not having to deal with the headaches of a courtroom and judge, a collaborative divorce process is much more streamlined. In a traditional litigated divorce, you’re likely dealing with court delays, motions and petitions, or scheduling conflicts. However, thanks to collaborative law’s focus on finding mutually agreeable solutions, resolutions are often reached much faster. “To resolve issues in litigation, you have a couple of tools: filing motions and petitions. These are both time-consuming and can take up to a few months to be completed,” Lisa explains. “In a collaborative situation, all you need to do is coordinate a meeting. You don’t have to wait on a court or judge.” The collaborative process also saves time, energy, and money through its unique approach to information gathering. Using a less formal approach when collecting details, both parties agree to automatic disclosures and acknowledge specific documents they may use throughout the process. “In a collaborative process, you make a list of more concise and specific documents,” Lisa explains. “Then, there’s more open-air communication, and we collectively have information that both parties can access — which is much less expensive and stressful.”
Choosing the Right Attorney (And Why Gill Family Law?)
When it comes to choosing the right attorney for a collaborative divorce, Lisa says it’s important to do your research. After all, you want someone who knows what they’re doing and is properly trained in collaborative law. At Gill Family Law, their attorneys practice both traditional litigation and collaborative law, but what sets them apart is their efficient internal processes and use of technology to manage information. “What you see a lot in firms that are small to midsize is that they do not have internal processes and technology to digest information quickly,” explains Lisa. “We have developed processes to very quickly digest large volumes of information in a way that makes us nimble. We’re able to use what we have found in those documents quickly in order to get the answer and reach a resolution faster.”
Brianna Goebel
Brianna is StyleBlueprint’s Associate Editor and Sponsored Content Manager. She is an avid fan of iced coffee and spends her free time reading romance novels.



